Since 2018, our team has been thrilled to work collaboratively with fishermen previously unable to fish during whale closures.
This February, NOAA granted them a permit to fish with these new gears in the area when North Atlantic right whales are migrating north with their new offspring!
Ropeless fishing gear opens 15,000 square nautical miles of previously closed fishing grounds for South Atlantic black sea bass fishermen
Press Release, February 2022.
Sustainable Seas Technology awarded exempted fishing permit by NMFS to partner with fishermen to deploy and test whale-safe fishing gear.
Fearing entanglement threats to endangered North Atlantic right whales, pot fishing for black sea bass was banned seasonally in the South Atlantic in 2013. Affected fishermen from North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida then began looking for cost-effective technology innovations to restart the economically valuable fishery. Nearly a decade later, NOAA Fisheries approved an exempted fishing permit for the fishery on Feb. 3, allowing fishermen to use whale-safe ropeless fishing gear.
“These fishermen are determined to get back fishing when whales are in the area,” says Kim Sawicki, founder and president of Sustainable Seas Technology, a nonprofit that focuses on both coastal community and whale conservation. “They aren’t afraid to try new technology to make a living.”
NOAA Fisheries and the South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council imposed the seasonal closure of 15,000 square (nautical) miles of prime black sea bass habitat, citing the risk ropes and buoy setups posed to North Atlantic right whales, who calve off the coast of Georgia and Florida in winter months. This is also the time of year black sea bass are easiest to target in the inshore fishing grounds.
This small artisanal fishery was economically important to many Southeastern coastal communities as an off-season fishery. Shrimpers and crabbers realized in the early-1960s that they could use the same traps they used for crab to catch black sea bass in winter months. Looking to revive their black sea bass fishery, fishermen self-funded a pilot study of ropeless gear, partnering with Sustainable Seas Technology for the project. Ropeless, pop-up gear as it’s alternatively called, store the traditional ropes and buoys at the bottom of the ocean, next to the traps. The elimination of this line and buoy from the water column, except when needed for hauling, is intended to remove risk to whales and their calves when transiting through fishing grounds.
Over the next two years, fishermen from all four states will fishing under special rules that allows them access to return to their prime fishing grounds using a variety of established and emerging ropeless technologies. These include many of the same devices that are also being tested in Maine and California in fishing areas that overlap with whale habitats and migratory routes. Interested black sea bass pot fishermen are encouraged to contact Kim Sawicki at Sustainable Seas Technology for demonstrations. A learning exchange that will take place later this year in Townsend, Georgia, stay posted for details.
About: Sustainable Seas Technology, 501(c)(3), works to test and promote innovative fishing gear technology that economically sustains small fishing communities while also protecting whales and other marine life from entanglement in fishing gear.
There are so many things I am grateful for this Thanksgiving.
First and foremost, my family, friends, and dogs. They have supported me unconditionally for the last three years while I travel around two continents, meeting and working with inshore fishing communities. I wrote a blog post back in 2018 that I am acutely aware of today. It’s called, “Spend Some Time With People, Before You Change Their Way of Life.” Well, I have definitely been practicing what I preach, for sure. And while I’ve been doing that, another thing has occurred to me. Spending time with fishing families is good for my soul. It keeps me grounded. The knowledge they are willing to share is impossible to resist; and their intelligence and passion and practical wisdom is unmatched.
They have opened their homes to me and my family. They share their trials and tribulations, as well as their opinions with me. I have had a nearly limitless supply of dogs to cuddle when away from my own and have found fierce supporters who I am equally likely to fight for.
Today is the American holiday of Thanksgiving. It began as a day of “giving thanks and sacrifice for the blessing of the harvest” and of the preceding year. If you are not a fisherman/fisherwoman (That’s for you, Mel!) you may wonder, “How on earth does this relate to “ropeless fishing”?
Well, right now in California, hundreds of Dungeness crabbers (including one of my best friends) are missing a bumper holiday in their short market because of a large concentration of humpback whales who remain in the Gulf of the Farallones. Usually by this time of year the whales have begun their migration away from the area, and the D. Crab season is open for business. This year, the fleet in California will be lucky to make the Christmas market. The loss of just one of these holidays means that California families who traditionally offer D. Crab as a culturally important part of their Thanksgiving feast will not be able to buy it fresh, if at all. The fishermen and consumers aren’t the only ones missing out. The entire supply chain, from those who supply bait to the fishermen, trap builders, transport companies, wholesalers, retailers, and ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THEM are missing out. The D. Crab fishery is unquestionably the most economically important fishery on the entire West Coast. And they can’t provide product because of the presences of whales and the risk of fishing gear entanglement.
Right now, in the Southeast, one of my friends is probably just getting home after shrimping hard for the last few weeks to make sure that all of us have shrimp cocktail for Thanksgiving. He had problems both with his boat early this season, as well as finding reliable and available crew (He even asked me to crew, but I was on another coast!). He just got going a couple weeks ago and will likely be back working tonight or tomorrow after a quick dinner with his wife and children. He and a few other guys in that area could be pot fishing for black sea bass pulling quick day trips by now, but that fishery has essentially been closed for the last several years due to the risk of entanglement with North Atlantic right whales. That style of fishing was actually invented by shrimpers back in the 1960’s when they realized they would need to find something to help them make it through the winter. The black sea bass pot fishery became known to a lot of Southeast fishermen as the “Christmas” fishery because it was what allowed them to put food on the table and presents under the tree. They would soak their 35 small pots anywhere from a couple hours to a day or two and were able to fish hook and line for other things while the pots were sitting in close to the shore. This was especially important during the winter as it meant they had to use less fuel to get to the gear and could grab it up and bring it in if bad weather was coming- all without really doing anything too risky. They are now missing both the Thanksgiving and Christmas market for that fish, all because North Atlantic right whales are in the area, having babies. There are only 26 fishermen in this fishery, and all told, they only have about 1000 pots between them, the closed area is nearly 15,000 square nautical miles in size, and they have NEVER been implicated in a single interaction or entanglement with any whale species.
Right now, in New England, countless fishermen are banned from lobstering in LMA 1 (>957 square miles). NOAA says this will displace 60 vessels to other areas, which will effect no more than 120 lobstermen. This is patently untrue. It effects each and every fisherman as well as every community that depends on their resource. Lobstering is the second most important economic market in Maine. It employees literally thousands of people, all of whom have families, customers, children, and bills to pay. And right now, thousands of people are being affected by this closure, and are likely missing their Thanksgiving market. All because of the presence of North Atlantic right whales. If you ask any Maine lobsterman, they can tell you that they have not been implicated in a single NARW entanglement since 2012, when they implemented a significant set of gear changes designed to reduce the risk to these whales.
What’s the solution? I have a few ideas.
But last week at the Pacific Marine Expo, I heard both Michael Conroy, President of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), and Kristan Porter, President of the Maine Lobsterman’s Association (MLA), express their deep concern that if ropeless gear is proven to be effective, that it will be forced upon every pot fisherman in the United States, regardless of whether or not they can afford it.
And I heartily agree with that concern. My work focuses on smaller operations. Inshore, coastal fishing vessels that are crewed by hard-working men and women with families and deep cultural ties to their work and their communities. My work does center around spending time with people before I try to change the way they do things. But it also has brought me to realize something much greater.
It is impossible to work and live among these families and not begin to understand and feel their struggle deeply. These are people who depend on the ocean to provide a bountiful harvest, and thus, they are resolved to practice good stewardship and sustainable methods to ensure the resources are there for the future. They are also human beings with families, and mortgages, and even some employees. Their work is the very backbone of multibillion dollar industries that provide for thousands of other families. As researchers and supporters of ropeless fishing gear and techniques, we must ensure that our work to refine, design, and implement these solutions aren’t helping special-interest groups put our friends and their communities out of business, permanently. Plenty of fishermen have helped with research in the US that has come to do just that, SO THE FEAR IS REAL, AND UNDERSTANDABLE.
We HAVE to make sure they can continue to do this safely and affordably, or we will all be losing out. And not just on a Thanksgiving or Christmas appetizer.
There are more than one million vertical lines off the North American coast of the Atlantic Ocean used by the lobster and crab fishing industry (Hayes et al., 2018). Pot/trap fishing gear, specifically the vertical lines attached to traps, poses an ongoing danger to both mariners and marine mammals, such as right whales.
In fact, entanglement in fishing gear is the leading cause of death for the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale (NARW), Eubalaena glacialis. With an estimated population of about 400 individuals and only 100 breeding-age females, the species lies on the brink of extinction (Pettis et al., 2020, NOAA, 2019a). Since June 2017, thirty right whales have died, nearly twice as many as the previous five years (NOAA, 2020).
Since 1986, researchers and fisheries managers have identified geographic areas “of special concern” with regard to entanglements of right whales: the Gulf of Maine (ME), the Georges Bank (MA), and the Great South Channel (MA), which are also home to the American lobster and a robust commercial pot/trap fishery (Prescott and Best, 1986). In the past five years, entanglement has also been an increasing concern in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, related to their snow crab fishery (Daoust et al., 2017). Of the right whales remaining, 85 percent have been entangled at least once, and over 50 percent show signs of having been entangled more than once (Knowlton et al., 2012; Pettis et al., 2020). These entanglements not only lead to whale deaths but also decrease whales’ ability to produce calves, further endangering the species (Sharp et al., 2019).
Despite the recognition of gear entanglements as a significant threat to the endangered North Atlantic right whale, efforts to modify gear, such as sinking ground lines and weak links, have not eliminated this threat.(Myers et al., 2019) The most effective way to reduce or eliminate fisheries-related entanglements and mortality would be to reduce lobster fishing in the same geographic areas as marine animals, a principle known as “reduction of effort” (Smolowitz, 1978b). Any reduction in the number of buoys, endlines, and traps would lead to a reduction in entanglements, gear loss, and navigational hazards (Smolowitz, 1978a; Johnson, 2000; Macfadyen et al., 2009).
Introducing ropeless fishing gear is the natural solution: it would reduce vertical lines in the water without reducing lobster fishing, particularly in the areas of concern. Ropeless fishing gear is an innovative technology that removes the need for buoys and vertical lines in the water, except during active retrieval. The gear combines regular pot/trap fishing with a sophisticated acoustic release system that allows fishermen to retrieve their gear without the need of a vertical line and buoy connecting the trap to the surface.
The concept of ropeless gear for pot/trap fishing was first introduced in 1998 when the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued its first contract to develop an acoustic release system (DeAlteris, 1999). Subsequently, ropeless fishing developed and multiple innovative and viable systems were created. In fact, after more than 20 years of innovation and sustained research, and thanks to both private and federal funding, many technological developments have moved the market forward from what was merely a theoretical concept to a real solution to marine mammal entanglements.
-Kim Sawicki is a Fulbright-Schuman Program Alumni affiliated with the University of Connecticut, the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, and the Marine Institute in the Republic of Ireland. In addition to her ongoing research, the author fosters informed discussion of coastal community and cetacean conservation through innovation on her website, Sustainable Seas. Since November 2018, she has served as a liaison between eight underwater technology companies and entrepreneurs that have mature products or are actively developing ropeless technologies. She is a volunteer for the Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme, the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group, and the State of Connecticut’s Region 4 Incident Management Team (since 2010). She is one of the founding members of the Irish Entanglement Alliance, and with the guidance of the gear manufacturers listed within the report, she advised the New England Fishery Management Council’s (NEFMC) gear research group on the standardization of research methodologies for ropeless. Currently, she is involved in ongoing research in Georgia, Ireland, and the UK on the implementation of ropeless fishing technologies and recently completed a pilot study with Scottish creel fishers.
Contributing authors and collaborators: James A.R. McFarlane, Michael Shegog, John Fiotakis, Rich Riels, Jacob Wolf, Maxwell Poole, Aaron Stevenson, Marco Flagg, Robert Morris, Michael Stocker, Hannah Myers, Edward Wyman,Cormac Hondros-MacCarthy, Ted Zhu, Russ Mullins.
Author’s Note: In the interest of hastening the continued progress of ropeless fishing, in November of 2018, eight companies that have either a mature product or are actively developing ropeless technologies formed an informal working group after the Ropeless Consortium meeting trough which they collaborate and share data through a central researcher. The author and Fulbright student, affiliated with the University of Connecticut, the University of St. Andrews, and the Marine Institute, has functioned as a liaison for information gathering to answer many of the questions posed by the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction team. That data can be viewed in the full version of this document, available below.
The opinions, calculations, and summary points are those of the author, only, but were the result of conversations, data sharing, and collaboration with many of the above listed parties. Several of the above mentioned parties were directly quoted in this report and are being listed as coauthors or collaborators.
“If I seem like a radical, it may be because I see things that others do not. I think if others had the opportunity to witness what I’ve seen in my lifetime…I would not seem like a radical at all. We have a chance to fix things.”
-Her Deepness, Sylvia Earle. Mission Blue
It has taken several days for me to sit down and write this post. This is not because I don’t know what to say, but because writing the words will make it real.
A year ago, I didn’t even know what a North Atlantic Right Whale was. Since that time, I have spent countless hours researching these animals, their families, their food, their habitats, their mating and migratory behaviors. I have also studied their necropsy reports, lab results, and a multitude of photos that exist of these animals and their babies. Too often, the images I see show them sliced apart or strangled by various fishing lines and lost gear, washed ashore as nothing more than deflated sacks of bone. The images of gaping wounds from propellers or a pathologist’s knife are becoming so common that now I feel each birth, and each loss, as intimately as if they were my own family.
We have lost 6 of a critically endangered species so far this season. Four of them were female. We know that there are less than 100 breeding females in this tiny population that now numbers only 412. And this number only stands if all 7 of the calves born in Georgia and Florida survive their first year of life.
I will add more to this post as information becomes available, but please take a moment to pay tribute to these six individual animals whose lives enriched our coastal waters for too short of a time.
We still have a chance to fix things.
-Kim Sawicki, 1 July 2019
Please consider a donation to the Center for Coastal Studies, an organization that does incredible work for our North Atlantic Right Whales, as well as our ecosystem-at-large.
We know that Punctuation, a 38-year-old grandmother, had been previously entangled in fishing gear before and survived. We also know that she was struck twice by boat propellers and lived. We know that she had at least 8 calves that also had successful births. We also know that she traveled to the Gulf of Saint Lawrence this summer, was struck by a third boat, and was killed.
We know that Comet, 34, was a grandfather as well. It has been determined by his autopsy, completed June 28th, 2019 by by the Marine Animal Response Society, DFO, Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, the Atlantic Veterinary College, the province and the Canadian Coast Guard that his death was also, likely due to ship strike.
We know that Wolverine, whose cause of death has yet to be determined, was only 9 years old. This is the equivalent of a 9 year-old human child dying of “unknown” causes. Wolverine was named for the propeller gashes visible along his spine. He also had been the victim of a series of entanglements.
We know that Clipper, who was necropsied today on the Gaspe Penisula, was the victim many years ago of a previous ship strike that left her with a clipped tail fluke. She was first seen in 2004, and had likely been a mother twice. Clipper was reported as of July 5th, 2019 to have also been killed by a ship strike.
No. 3815 was first seen as a calf off New Jersey in May 2008. She is the daughter of Harmony, No. 3115, who was the daughter of No. 1815. She was only 12 years old, and was just entering the age of sexual maturity.
No. 3329 was likely born in December 2002 off Georgia. She is the daughter of Viola No. 2029 who was the daughter of Ipanema, No. 1629. She was also quite photogenic.
Below you will find links and videos highlighting the current manufacturers of several different styles of this innovative gear. Not all of the gear videos are the most current, as some of the designs are protected under non-disclosure agreements with the author or patents pending. As newer videos become available, this page will be updated. I have also included links to contact the manufacturers directly under each video.
The systems are presented in alphabetical order. Feel free to contact the author for any questions.
Past research has indicated an undeniable benefit to the use of innovative ropeless gear within pot and trap fisheries with a removal of end lines and buoy lines. (Baumgartner et al., 2018.; Werner et al., 2015; Lent, 2017; FAO, 2018) These innovative approaches to end line management allow for the lowered risk of bycatch and entanglements of critically endangered species, most particularly that of the North Atlantic Right Whale.
It is imperative that a better understanding of the benefits and potential gains be attained if technology such as this is to be affordable and accepted for widespread use for pot/trap fisheries. Due the innate differences of individual fisheries, it is well accepted that there will likely not exist one perfect ropeless technology that will address all of the individual needs of all fisheries. Many of the current designs have several decades of successful use in other applications, serving to catalyze and invigorate new manufacturers of gear, as well as thoughtful adaptations of existing devices.
As with any proposed change to fishing technique or technology, there has historically been a period of resistance, research, and adjustment. This period has been unusually long for ropeless gear, and thus far, much of the discourse between management and industry partners has been laden with untested hypothetical concerns regarding functionality and implementation.
Valid concerns provided by fishers with decades of harvesting experience have not been reasonably resolved with the limited testing that has been completed by manufacturers, environmental non-government organizations, or fisheries partners. To ensure the continued success of a co-management approach to fisheries practices, priority needs to be given to further this testing.
“Where wisdom reigns, there is no conflict between thinking and feeling.” –Carl Gustav Jung
Civic engagement and communication are the most vital link to understanding those factors that drive successful policy change. Immersing oneself in local cultural activities can work to promote the position of all scientists working in marine conservation. Cerebral comprehension of issues that concern fishing communities when faced with change is not enough to inform decision makers, instead, having a “finger on the pulse” of that which makes a community strong is. Often, understanding comes from rapport that develops through identifying shared interests and commonalities.
Spending quality time with those lives you will affect through suggested policy changes ensures that you have the opportunity to not only study the economic impacts these policies can and do have on these communities, but also the cultural implications and experiences that are realized.
The past two years have been transformative but incredibly busy for Sustainable Seas Technology. Here’s a look back at our key milestones and the progress we’ve made in advancing ropeless fishing gear.
1. Advancements in Ropeless Fishing Gear
Ropeless fishing gear has been at the forefront of our efforts. Traditional fishing methods, particularly those involving ropes and buoys, have long posed threats to marine life, especially to large mammals like whales. Entanglements can lead to injuries or even fatalities, which is why the development and promotion of ropeless fishing gear has been crucial.
These workshops have been instrumental in bridging the gap between technology and its practical application. We have explored issues such as virtual gear marking strategies, societal pressure from adjacent fisheries, economic challenges, marketing, and adoption barriers. By listening to the concerns and insights of fishermen, we’ve been able to help tailor solutions to meet the unique challenges they face.
2023 was a landmark year for field testing. We launched several pilot programs across different fishing communities to test the efficacy and adaptability of our ropeless gear. We have continued our previous work on the East Coast of the United States, spending most of the fall and winter with our black sea bass fishers, stress testing the gear. The feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, with many fishermen noting the ease of use and the tangible benefits to marine life.
As we move forward, our focus remains on continuous innovation, collaboration, and expansion of available gears. We’re excited to grow our gear cache to make more ropeless fishing systems available to communities both in the US and abroad. Additionally, we aim to expand our available mobile gear workshops to make our work with bicoastal fishing communities easier and more affordable.
Mark Baumgartner’s presentation at the 2019 Ropeless Consortium meeting in Portland, ME inspired me to focus my fieldwork efforts on three key points he made regarding ropeless gear testing.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
“Ropeless gear needs to be safe for fishermen to use and safe for whales.”-M. Baumgartner
I have spent two years working directly with nearly all of the ropeless gear manufacturers to conduct hundreds of dock, inshore, and offshore trials of their products with fishers. Before any introduction to ropeless gear onboard a vessel commences, I spend time observing the regular daily workings of boats in the fishery I am working within. My observations and resultant questions are posed to individual fishers in an effort to create a research design that is both safe for researchers and fishers, as well as functional for effective data collection. I use a strict tiered protocol that involves researchers and fishers learning the gear dockside, then teaching its use to others, and finally progressing to a level of “mastery.” Once I am confident they can work without mentor observation on the dock, they progress to learning on vessels. This tiered approach is then repeated onboard fishing vessels while underway. Once they progress to on-board mastery, they are free to work independently and without safety lines when the boat is functioning in a research capacity, while additional and concurrent tasks are added, such as virtual gear marking. Finally, a third tier of mastery is reached during normal fishing activities. Until this level of mastery is reached, I feel an individual is not truly proficient in using ropeless gear in a fisheries application, which could lead to discouragement of use by fishermen, a belief of inefficacy, unsafe fishing practices, added risk to marine mammals, and the loss of the device and/or fishing gear.
Fail to prepare, prepare to fail
“Testing of ropeless gear should be done by an independent third-party working directly with fishermen that have been properly trained to use the gear.” -M. Baumgartner
I wholeheartedly agree with concept of third-party testing of ropeless gear and that both the third-party researchers and fishermen should be properly and thoroughly trained before the use of gear on their own. Many difficulties have been experienced by research projects in the last year due to COVID restrictions, but for the safety of those testing gear, as well as the safety of the fisher’s gear attached to ropeless devices, creative methods have been implemented to try and negate the loss of in-person training. Additionally, this training is important to ensure objective results from these trials, as human error or lack of experience is the number one cause of ropeless malfunctions, to date.
Mark’s call to action for independent third party research was further cemented for me in January 2020, when I surveyed the nine Scottish fishers I trained in ropeless fishing gear proficiency, and asked them who they would prefer to to engage with in a learning exchange. The only consensus reached was that they would prefer to learn from an independent researcher. The next most favored option was learning from other fishermen. (Figure 1). I have been fortunate to have functioned in the field thus far as an independent researcher, without an affiliation to any manufacturers, universities, for-profit groups, etc. that could be seen as contributing bias to results. In my experience, this has led to a robust and candid conversation on all topics ropeless, and critical to understanding the challenges and fears fishers express about the technology.
“Information is not knowledge.” ― Albert Einstein
Aka Why does any of this matter? Human factors engineering!
We must “Develop ropeless gear testing protocols through harmonization of multiple manufacturers’ protocols through a collaborating working group (what metrics need to be measured).”-M. Baumgartner
To continue the promising work with innovative fishing gears that reduce bycatch, the relationship of fisher to gear to innovation needs to be studied, this is done through the Human Factors Engineering process. Fortunately, there are MANY great models in place that can be used to help move this forward. Unbeknownst to many, it is this approach that grew out of the processes that have allowed humans to enjoy modern conveniences like the automobile, the home computer, and cell phone. To that end, I initiated an informal researcher/manufacturer working group during the 2018 Ropeless Consortium meeting to attempt to answer this need, as well as other stated needs by regulators regarding ropeless gear. Mark Baumgartner (WHOI) echoed this need and after 2019 year’s consortium meeting, NEFSC staff began a group that has met in different configurations to share approaches to research design. As of today, February 17, 2021, no standard testing protocol or measurable metrics consensus has been reached. I firmly believe a full-scale ropeless trial should include a high-quality, refined industry & fisher recommended minimal data set; such as the one utilized in recent gear research performed in the South Atlantic black sea bass pot fishery. This will allow fishers and management in other parts of the world to weigh in on what issues are important for their conditions and needs, and will help guide R&D work needed for adaptation and optimal marine mammal, fisher, and gear safety.
“Opinion is usually something which people have when they lack comprehensive information.” ― Idries Shah
I agree with Mark’s belief that these harmonized protocols are needed to develop a clear understanding of the functionality of these gears and should be utilized during all research efforts and finally that,
These tests also need to serve the role of demonstrating the technology to many stakeholders such as other fishermen, regulators, conservationists, public; and this needs to be done for as many gear types as possible.-M. Baumgartner
Without a standard approach to data collection and reporting, it seems unlikely that our widespread efforts will produce the required faith by those stakeholders who are at the center of this work. While preparatory pilots and gear demos help establish excellent working relationships, our fisher collaborators depend on their research partners to develop strong and informed goals that generate concrete, tangible, and meaningful results. Without a clear and collaborative path forward in our efforts, many of these well-intentioned pilots (particularly those which are fisher-funded or rely on vessel, fuel, and crew time donation) could suffer, and we, as researchers, could actually be damaging these precious working relationships. For those who see these technologies as an opportunity, or even a necessity, it’s vital they have the utmost faith in our abilities, and we have a reasonable expectation of what can be accomplished to that end.
The trust placed in us by fishers is paramount; we have an obligation to earn and maintain that.
I arrived home Wednesday morning at 530am after another sixty straight days of ropeless research. Another 4,000 miles on the car, and tracing the nearly exact migration path of a North Atlantic right whale. And while we worked with some of the most experienced and creative pot fishers on the East Coast, the news of two more entangled right whales reached us.
The feelings I go through when another entanglement is reported, in order: sadness, anger, then frustration. After about a day, those feelings settle into a doubling down of determination. It was a new experience for our team to be together, and actively fishing with the gear when this news broke. As heartbreaking as it was, we found a renewed sense of purpose and a reserve of energy that pushed us through the last back-breaking weeks of work. The video below was a product of this process, and all the credit goes to Joel Cohen and videographer, Brad Sawicki. They are not only incredibly resourceful around a boat, but also pretty handy with a camera!
While there are larger, more influential groups researching these gears, we are proud of the way we operate. Our data collection is swift, certain, and powered by one of the most brilliant minds we know, Virgil Zetterlind. Our methods and preparation are second to none. Our desire for understanding and communicating with those whose livelihoods are being directly impacted by the co-occurrence of North Atlantic right whales and pot fisheries is earnest and appreciated. We work hard, all hours of the day and night, for no pay, because we believe that we can make a difference.
You can, too.
We have family, friends, and colleagues that support us with words, actions, and even donations…Without them, this trip would have been impossible. We are always looking for volunteers and partners to help us in this mission. With COVID times upon us, many aren’t able to come haul traps and pots with us in other states, or mount cameras on gear or in traps, or pack bait, or fill ice…but we will gladly hold that spot for you next time.
Here is an amazing video made for us by the Ullapool Sea Savers Ropeless Fishing Ambassador, Caillin, about fishing “entanglement free!”
Fisherwoman Barbie is part of a fantastic set of to-scale models that accompany us on our global outreach missions. These functional models of both gear, whales, and humans help make the issue more accessible to people while being much easier to pack!
Happy Birthday, Caillin!! The whales and fishermen thank you so much!!
A fundraiser organized by Sustainable Seas to benefit the Large Whale Disentanglement Team of British Divers Marine Life Rescue. Photos and videos were provided courtesy of BDMLR staff and volunteers, Kim Sawicki of Sustainable Seas, and Nick McCaffrey of South Spear Media.
Fishing gear designed to protect whales from entanglement is being trialled off Scotland’s coast.
Whales can become caught in rope that runs between shellfish creels on the seabed to a buoy on the surface.
The new “ropeless creels” have this main line in a container along with a buoy and these are lowered to the seabed with the creels.
The buoy is released electronically and rises to the surface, bringing the rope with it so the creels can be retrieved.
The technology is being developed initially for fisheries in the US and Canada where endangered North Atlantic right whales have died in entanglements.
Those involved in the trials, including the Scottish Entanglement Alliance (SEA) – a coalition of conservation groups, rescue teams and fishermen – say Scotland’s coast offers ideal conditions for testing ropeless creels.
Scientist Kim Sawicki, who is working on the US-EU funded research, said: “Right now a lot of fisheries are suffering closures both in the US and Canada due to entanglement issues with cetaceans, particularly the North Atlantic right whale.
“Fishermen are losing money and are not able to feed their families.”
The researcher said creel fishing in the Gulf of Maine alone could involve one million main lines.
“A group of manufacturers have come together to design systems that store the rope at depth so that it is not a risk to whales,” she added.
Creel fishing usually involves lowering a fleet of 30 to 50 weighted-down pots to the seabed. The pots are strung together on rope and the last creel has a line going from it to a buoy on the surface.
The buoy aids in the retrieval of the creels, but also acts as a marker to other fishermen to where the gear is.
Bally Philip, a Kyle of Lochalsh-based creel fisherman working with the project in Scotland, said the project team was taking on board fishermen’s suggested improvements to the ropeless system.
He said: “We use the buoy to see where the gear is, so we need to develop the corresponding tracking system and also a way of advising other fishermen to where the ‘ropeless’ gear is. All that has still to be developed.
“But there is a real urgency to develop this stuff because all around the world there are places where endangered species are getting entangled in fishing gear.”
She said that in the past year in Scotland, there had been about 12 incidents of entanglements with two as classed as “chronic” due to the injuries caused to the animals involved.
She added: “Fishermen want to help. They work alongside these large animals and are devastated when an entanglement happens.”
A very very huge thank you to Iain and Brian for coming out to share our story!You can learn more about the entanglement issue in Scotland by clicking on one of the links below!
One of the most critical aspects to the objective collection and analysis of data requires that bias be eliminated wherever and whenever possible. This means testing the gear in locations where conditions, both sea and social, present no obstacles to fishers providing feedback on design and applicability to their practices.
To ensure the continued success of a co-management approach to fisheries practices, priority needs to be given to the design of more thoughtful experimental trials that allow the technology alone to be reviewed. To date, gear testing, trials, and demonstrations have not been conducted in a standardized manner, making data difficult to review and reach scientific consensus. It is essential to create a proficient methodology considering the equipment, preparation, deployment, and retrieval of the gear, which can only be accomplished through collaboration between researchers, gear developers, and fishermen.
Over the next few weeks, I will be publishing all of the feedback from those involved in the Scottish creel ropeless fishing survey as a series of separate posts. I will focus on different aspects of the survey each week to allow for thoughtful processing by others of their comments and observations and would encourage any and all respectful feedback be submitted by others.
Fishers have confidence in themselves and others to Learn & usE ropeless technology
These results are from anonymous survey conducted with eight Scottish creel fishermen, seven of who had trialed and/or actively fished with two ropeless fishing devices (Fiomarine’s Fiobuoy® and Desert Star Systems, ARC-1,) and this researcher. (September 2019-January 2020.) The eighth fisher was educated on the systems, but was not able to trial the gears, and the ninth participant was a marine biologist who was invited by a fisher to participate in ropeless training who is also a member of British Diver’s Marine Life Rescue (disentanglement team) who actively worked the gears with a fisher.
Because the cost of ropeless retrieval technology has been widely discussed in most previous trials that fishermen have participated in, it was not a primary focus of this outreach effort. In fact, many of the comments from past published surveys, research, reports, and articles surrounding the testing of gear pertain to cost, indicating that fishers knew that the technology represented an additional cost to them. While transparency is vital to maintaining trusting relationships between researchers and fishermen, this repetitive discussion of cost likely has led to a negative bias on survey and study results. Finally, fishers have expressed a reluctance participate in surveys or testing (not just related to ropeless) and unintentionally advance new or restrictive regulations to their fishery.
Instead, during these trials, the researcher chose to discuss the costs affiliated with fishing with end lines and buoys, and how gear loss effects fishers and the general public in a variety of ways prior to any discussion of prices per unit.
What did Fishers have to say about the gear?
The following statements are offered as a sample of the feedback received. Overall, the qualitative data affirmed technical success and identified ongoing challenges:
“I was really impressed…A few wee tweaks, I think it would be ready to go really. There’s all these little subtleties, but once you get the hang of it, there’s not much to it
“We’ve seen six bits of gear, mostly buoys, on the shore right here; I’d argue if it was ropeless, there wouldn’t be any.”
“The obvious advantage is removing the whole entanglement issue, but also for us, we lose quite a lot of gear here, to either other fishermen or boats, and we get our gear dragged about quite a bit by the weather, so if the buoys are deep enough, those things aren’t issues at all. Sometimes, with big swell, the buoys will pick up the last creel, and it walks up the fleet and picks up the next creel, so you end up with this ball of creels, picking up the next as they go. If you had ropeless gear, that wouldn’t be an issue.”